Kevin Bryant

Lieutenant Governor of South Carolina

Lieutenant Governor of South Carolina

 

about  contact 
facebook
twitter

Search

watch the senate

Archives

Powered by Genesis

one reason to support the department of administration

April 6, 2011 by Kevin Bryant

H. 3066 creates a department of administration and, among other things, moves the employee/retiree health insurance program from the Budget and Control Board to the new Department of Administration, accountable to the top elected official in SC.

I support moving the System away from the Budget and Control Board for the very reason that it has been under the watch of the Board that the unfunded liability has grown to $18 billion this year. The answer to your question of “how could this happen” lies in the fact that politicians simply made benefit promises that cost more than the System took in over the last decade. Moreover, the Board sanctioned actuarial assumptions that masked the problem during all of those years.

The System is underfunded far beyond the capacity of its ability to catch up through investments or the ability of the taxpayers to make the necessary cash infusion. Your thoughts on future benefit changes are good ones, and they will be pursued. But, I cannot support leaving in place the same oversight authority that led us into this predicament.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Palmetto Family Council: Illinois court strikes rule forcing pharmacists to violate their conscience

April 6, 2011 by Kevin Bryant

“There is a widespread attack on conscience in America,” said AUL’s Dr. Charmaine Yoest. “But today an Illinois court ruled that the state cannot target pharmacists simply because of their religious beliefs.”

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Americans United for Life President and CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest applauded a decision today from an Illinois circuit court that struck down a state administrative rule forcing pharmacists and pharmacies to dispense “emergency contraception” against their conscientious beliefs. Long involved in the case, AUL first represented the plaintiffs in 2005 when Morr-Fitz, Inc. vs. Blagojevich was filed.

The complaint alleged that then Gov. Rod Blagojevich violated the conscience rights of pharmacists and pharmacies by requiring them to dispense “emergency contraception” against their religious convictions. As the case has proceeded, AUL’s involvement included two amicus curiae briefs on behalf of national medical organizations in support of the plaintiffs and the conscience rights of all health care providers in the state of Illinois. Click here and here to read those briefs.

In today’s ruling, the court found that the rule was improperly aimed only at pharmacists and pharmacies holding religious convictions. While proponents of the draconian rule claim it is necessary in order to ensure availability of “emergency contraception,” the court noted that not a single person has ever been unable to obtain “emergency contraception” because of a pharmacist’s religious objection.

Dr. Yoest commended the state court: “For six years, pharmacists and pharmacies have been bullied by the state of Illinois into choosing between violating their religious beliefs or violating the law. We applaud the Illinois circuit court for permanently striking this unconstitutional rule.”

For more information on healthcare freedom of conscience, go here.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Palmetto Family Council Life Votes in House

April 5, 2011 by Kevin Bryant



The Freedom of Conscience Act and the Huh? Caucus

Americans United for Life analyzes state laws related to Life every year. AUL even goes so far as to rank the states in the strength of their laws on abortion, protection of the unborn(in contexts outside of abortion), bioethics, the end-of-life, and health care freedom of conscience.

South Carolina is currently ranked 19th of the 50 states. 19th. We can do better.

But in order to be rated among the Top Ten pro-life states in the country, we must close two serious gaps: Born Alive Infant Protection and Conscience Protection. We discussed Born Alive in our last message to you.

When it comes to Conscience, though South Carolina law is very strong on the right to object to taking part in abortion, there is no protection for health care professionals or institutions in other ethically questionable areas such as stem cell research or euthanasia.

So, we were glad to see H.3408, the South Carolina Healthcare Freedom of Conscience Act, which came up on the House floor for an extended debate last Tuesday.

If you read the online voting score sheet on H. 3408 posted on the statehouse website, you will see that 69 members voted in favor of final passage of the bill, 41 voted against, 5were excused, and eight 8 just didn’t bother to vote.

We win. Sounds good. But what does it really mean?

To get a clear picture of the real position of each individual legislator on the larger issue of Life, we must consider all votes cast on Born Alive and Conscience last Tuesday. So, Palmetto Family took all 9 roll calls and analyzed them in a huge spreadsheet (1,107 cells for those of you who appreciate such things).

When tallied, the nine roll call votes reveal three distinct groups of legislators as pie charted above:

  • 60% voted pro-life every single time. This Consistently Pro-Life group of 74 voted pro-life right down to procedural motions like tabling and “carrying over,” as well as amendments and final passage.
  • 20% were equally as consistent on the other side. These 25 or so Consistently Pro-“Choice” members of the General Assembly voted wrong every single time, whether it be procedural or passage.
  • 20% could be called The Huh? Caucus (24). These state representatives did everything they could to water down the bill by voting for amendments that would have weakened it. Or, they voted to kill the bill procedurally. But, with 60% of the House sticking with the pro-life position every single time the voting bell rang, these folks eventually reversed course and voted for final passage. That way they could say they voted for the bill while actually trying to eviscerate it. This group voted Aye only when the outcome was inevitable. Of the 24, seven (7) members in particular were all over the map. They voted for some weakening amendments and not others, and some didn’t vote for final passage after voting against some of the weakening amendments.

Palmetto Family Alliance will continue to monitor the voting records of the members of the South Carolina House and Senate in preparation for our 2011-2012 Legislative Scorecard. The Scorecard will include The Huh? Caucus. To review the Scorecard from the last legislative session, please visit this page.

Thank you for your support of this work.

PALMETTO FAMILY ALLIANCE

You have received this message because you have subscribed to a mailing list of Palmetto Family Council. If you do not wish to receive periodic emails from this source, please click below to unsubscribe.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Rep. Mulvaney on the President’s Budget: These Are Not Credible Numbers

April 4, 2011 by Kevin Bryant

Filed Under: Uncategorized

gmail motion

April 1, 2011 by Kevin Bryant

A new way to communicate
The mouse and keyboard were invented before the Internet even existed. Since then, countless technological advancements have allowed for much more efficient human computer interaction. Why then do we continue to use outdated technology? Introducing Gmail Motion — now you can control Gmail with your body. click here to try gmail motion click here to try gmail motion

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • …
  • 389
  • Next Page »