S. 333 sez as a condition of probation upon a 2nd or subsequent conviction of DUI, a court may require that an offender wear a continuous remote alcohol monitoring device, to provide that a finding by the court that the offender’s blood alcohol concentration meets or exceeds .08 %. As in most legislation, funding sources are in question. What if the offender can’t afford the expense of the device? the bill was carried over to gather more information.
There is some interesting technology available these days. check this out